Daniel Amos Message Board (http://www.danielamos.com/wbb2/index.php)
- DA Related Discussion (http://www.danielamos.com/wbb2/board.php?boardid=4)
-- General Discussion (http://www.danielamos.com/wbb2/board.php?boardid=1)
--- DAconomics (http://www.danielamos.com/wbb2/thread.php?threadid=2881)


Posted by Joey T. on 05-19-2003 at16:02:

 

quote:
Originally posted by Driver8
quote:
Originally posted by Driver8
Big Grin



red x's suck.... Frown


( you can't link from geocities..... Red Face )



Posted by audiori on 05-19-2003 at16:03:

 

We're getting way off of the point here...

I've never even understood what the argument was, but if it continues it should be off-board I think. This isn't helping anyone and the more I'm forced to explain our point the more details have to be posted about this arrangement - which are not really anyones business other than ours, the bands, Warm&Filleds and Lo-Fidelity's.

Shall we just delete this thread and call it quits? Jeffrey/Coal?



Posted by JR88 on 05-19-2003 at16:05:

  Geocities Sucks!

Big Grin



Posted by JR88 on 05-19-2003 at16:07:

 

quote:
Originally posted by audiori

We're getting way off of the point here... shall we just delete this thread and call it quits?

I've never even understood what the argument is.


Just trying to lighten the mood. After all we're all here because we Love Da/Dogs and TST.

Bye-Bye

Love Ya Big Grin

Big Grin



Posted by DaLe on 05-19-2003 at16:09:

  YeS

quote:
Originally posted by audiori

We're getting way off of the point here... shall we just delete this thread and call it quits?

I've never even understood what the argument is.


I HaVe a few threads I would like to delete too... Big Grin



Posted by JR88 on 05-19-2003 at16:10:

 

quote:
Originally posted by DaLe uReViG
quote:
Originally posted by audiori

We're getting way off of the point here... shall we just delete this thread and call it quits?

I've never even understood what the argument is.


I HaVe a few threads I would like to delete too... Big Grin


Big Grin



Posted by dfroystad on 05-19-2003 at16:12:

 

so what happen to the discussion about a possible 'inverstors fund' for a new DA record ?



Posted by audiori on 05-19-2003 at16:13:

 

quote:
Originally posted by DaLe uReViG
quote:
Originally posted by audiori

We're getting way off of the point here... shall we just delete this thread and call it quits?

I've never even understood what the argument is.


I HaVe a few threads I would like to delete too... Big Grin


We thought about deleting a few threads in the argument dump, but it may result in a "demotion" of a certain Grand Encephalon.



Posted by audiori on 05-19-2003 at16:14:

 

quote:
Originally posted by dfroystad
so what happen to the discussion about a possible 'inverstors fund' for a new DA record ?


I suppose we could manually move those posts to a new thread. Or maybe we can just delete these Lo-Fidelity related bizarre-argument posts and leave everything else in place.



Posted by DaLe on 05-19-2003 at16:15:

  actually ...

No, I think some of these posts should be read,

If any constructive Ideas can come from them Great lets try them...

take any negative stuff that is true to heart, otherwise Ignore it & move on... like Terry said

... You have gone beyond the call of duty, and words cannot express my personal indebtedness to you. You have been gracious and understanding when we've hit a few snags, and you are wise to the economics of our situation and have the keen sense that this is indeed a "partnership" that goes far beyond a merely commercial enterprise. God bless you all, and a thousand 'thank yous' for all that you've helped us accomplish thus far. Because of you and God's faithfulness, we will continue to do what we do, and do it better than ever. I'm convinced it's going to be a fun and fulfilling year, and I want you to know that we've got a few surprises for you along the way.
Bless you in advance for making it possible.
Yours Under the Mercy,
Terry Scott Taylor



Posted by audiori on 05-19-2003 at16:26:

 

quote:
Originally posted by Coal Ridge
And that'll do it for me. I don't know what the agenda here was, but you're not getting the toothpaste back in the tube.


Answering your posts. Nothing else. If this "argument" that we never wanted hadn't happened, some of these details would not have been discussed. I'm not going to sit back and let you misrepresent the situation at our expense.



Posted by Joey T. on 05-19-2003 at16:31:

 

quote:
Originally posted by DaLe uReViG
No, I think some of these posts should be read,



too much to read here.... Red Face



Posted by DaLe on 05-19-2003 at16:35:

 

quote:
Originally posted by Joey T.
quote:
Originally posted by DaLe uReViG
No, I think some of these posts should be read,



too much to read here.... Red Face


U can just wait for the MoVie then Tongue



Posted by Joey T. on 05-19-2003 at16:37:

 

yeah, or the final outcome.... this is looking like a dump thread.... Roll Eyes



Posted by Coal Ridge on 05-19-2003 at16:45:

 

Delete away, if you'd like. I said I was dropping it, but obviously you hadn't read that post before the ensuing discussion about this discussion, if that makes sense. I don't think these posts are helping anyone, nor getting anywhere.

I hasten to add, I'm not Jeff, which you seem to be hinting at in your last few posts. If I were Jeff, I wouldn't be sitting in my office alternately arguing with you and editing training manuals. Actually, I'm the poster formally known as kevinf: I picked up "Coal Ridge" after my wife and I returned from our first overseas trip to the UK (saw Coleridge's grave at Westminster), and kevinf seems so boring compared to the other names here. Nobody's trying to pull a Mugglia, at least not with Mugglia's motivations.

Add to that the fact that I just talked to Jeff, and he's none to happy with me for continuing this discussion. So, since I've managed to Mountain Dew everyone off, I'll go find some other hill to die on!



Posted by kevinf on 05-19-2003 at16:47:

 

See ... this was me ...



Posted by Coal Ridge on 05-19-2003 at16:49:

 

... and now THIS is me. Nothing shifty going on besides a soft spot for the Romantics.



Posted by Joey T. on 05-19-2003 at16:53:

 

Roll Eyes



Posted by audiori on 05-19-2003 at17:04:

 

quote:
Originally posted by Coal Ridge
Delete away, if you'd like. I said I was dropping it, but obviously you hadn't read that post before the ensuing discussion about this discussion, if that makes sense. I don't think these posts are helping anyone, nor getting anywhere.


My thoughts exactly.

quote:


I hasten to add, I'm not Jeff, which you seem to be hinting at in your last few posts.


Nope, not hinting at that.. just talking to both of you.




Posted by audiori on 05-19-2003 at17:23:

  Last try


One last try to say this...
(My fingers on the delete button if someone misunderstands and a weird argument starts up again...).

"Is it better to buy directly from the band or directly from a label or unconnected store?"

All of the above are needed, for different reasons. DanielAmos.com, TheLostDogs.com and 77s.com will continue to release CDs and sell older titles - purchasing these directly supports the band and future releases.

We also encourage everyone to support other companies that are supporting these artists. Labels like Galaxy21 and Lo-Fidelity have been very supportive of the guys and will continue to be as long as they make their money back. They will continue to release titles exclusively through their labels (in addition to what the artists are releasing themselves) and need our support in order for future releases to be completed.

Buying the artists CDs through record stores or other online stores is also helpful, in its own way. It encourages these stores to continue to carry these artists releases.



Forum Software: Burning Board 2.3.6, Developed by WoltLab GmbH